lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which is simpler?
    > Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:
    >
    > >> Ah, and now the part I really like, some hard numbers:
    > >> swsusp takes between 26 and 30 seconds to suspend (in my four tries: 26,
    > >> 30, 28, 26) and between 35 and 45 seconds to resume (35, 45, 39, 37).
    > >>
    > >> Suspend 2 does suspend in around 14-16 seconds, and resume in 18 to 21.
    > >>
    > >> That is factor 2!
    > >
    > > Does that include time to boot resume kernel? It will not be that
    > > dramatic with that time included, and it is only fair to include
    > > it. Anyway uswsusp solves that issue.
    >
    > On my old ThinkPad, the difference is more like a factor of 3 to 4 -
    > from the moment I press the power button until X is up and running.

    Well, yep, it really depends on CPU/harddisk.

    Can you try code from suspend.sf.net? It should be as fast as
    suspend2.

    Pavel

    --
    Thanks, Sharp!
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-20 15:45    [W:0.020 / U:153.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site