![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> +int is_dependent_device(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> + struct dependent_device *dd;
> +
> + if (!ds)
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, device_list) {
> + if (handle == dd->handle)
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
(snip.)
> +struct dependent_device * get_dependent_device(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> + struct dependent_device *dd;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, device_list) {
> + if (handle == dd->handle)
> + return dd;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
Those look very similar...
> +
> + /* make sure we are dependent on the dock device */
> + acpi_get_name(dck_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJD", NULL, &ejd_buffer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + err("Unable to execute _EJD!\n");
> + goto find_ejd_out;
> + }
> +
> + /* because acpi_get_name will pad the names if they are less
> + * than 4 characters, we can't compare the strings returned
> + * from _EJD with those returned from acpi_get_name. So,
> + * we have to get a handle to the object referenced by _EJD
> + * and then call get name on that.
> + */
> + ejd_obj = ejd_buffer.pointer;
> + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, ejd_obj->string.pointer, &tmp);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + goto find_ejd_out;
> + acpi_get_name(tmp, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &ejd_name_buffer);
> +
> + dck_obj = buffer.pointer;
> + if (!strncmp(ejd_objname, objname, strlen(ejd_objname))) {
I don't think you need to compare pathnames.
Why not just compare ACPI handles like below?
if (dck_handle == tmp) {
...
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-02 05:14 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||