Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:28:41 -0500 | From | Jim Crilly <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
On 01/31/06 02:37:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Juerg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> wrote: > > > > So why do people try to convince me that there is a need to avoid the standard > > > SCSI protocol stack because a PC might have only ATAPI? > > > > > > Major OS implementations use a unique view on SCSI (MS-win [*], FreeBSD, Solaris, > > > ...). Why do people believe that Linux needs to be different? What does it buy > > > you to go this way? > > > > Why do you believe that Linux needs to do the same as every other OS? > > Why do you believe that Linux needs to be worse than other OS? >
Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e. mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different?
> Jörg
Jim. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |