![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 01/31/06 02:37:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Juerg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> wrote: > > > > So why do people try to convince me that there is a need to avoid the standard > > > SCSI protocol stack because a PC might have only ATAPI? > > > > > > Major OS implementations use a unique view on SCSI (MS-win [*], FreeBSD, Solaris, > > > ...). Why do people believe that Linux needs to be different? What does it buy > > > you to go this way? > > > > Why do you believe that Linux needs to do the same as every other OS? > > Why do you believe that Linux needs to be worse than other OS? > Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e. mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different? > Jörg Jim. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-02 07:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||