Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:50 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi!
> >Anyway, it means that suspend is still quite a hot topic, and that > >is good. (Linus said that suspend-to-disk is basically for people > >that can't get suspend-to-RAM to work, and after I got suspend-to- > >RAM to work reliably here, I can see his point). > > I completely agree. My Mac PowerBook has had suspend-to-RAM for a > long time; I shut the lid and about 3 seconds later it's asleep, open > it and 3 seconds later it's awake. Leave it sleeping for a week on a > full charge, come back to find it still asleep. I can even put it to > sleep, remove a drained battery and put in a fresh one (it has a > small internal 2-minute RAM battery), then wake it up and resume > work. I'm curious though, what proportion of laptop hardware > actually has support for suspend-to-RAM? (including hardware for > which linux does not yet have support). What percent of that > hardware _does_ have Linux support?
99%+ of notebooks can do s-t-ram, and perhaps 50% desktops. Linux should work on 70% or so... -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |