Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:43:40 +0100 | From | Sander <> | Subject | Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 |
| |
Mark Lord wrote (ao): > On Friday 17 February 2006 03:45, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >Submit a patch... > > You mean, something like this one? > Untested at present, as I was hoping to hear > back from one of the original problem reporters > after they tested it.
Not the original reporter, but your patch Works For Me. I get these:
[ 633.449961] md: md1: sync done. [ 633.456070] RAID5 conf printout: [ 633.456117] --- rd:9 wd:9 fd:0 [ 633.456164] disk 0, o:1, dev:sda2 [ 633.456208] disk 1, o:1, dev:sdb2 [ 633.456250] disk 2, o:1, dev:sdc2 [ 633.456298] disk 3, o:1, dev:sdd2 [ 633.456340] disk 4, o:1, dev:sde2 [ 633.456383] disk 5, o:1, dev:sdf2 [ 633.456427] disk 6, o:1, dev:sdg2 [ 633.456470] disk 7, o:1, dev:sdh2 [ 633.456514] disk 8, o:1, dev:sdi2 [ 787.639858] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 787.657991] EXT3 FS on md1, internal journal [ 787.658023] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode. [ 1872.338185] ata6: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [ 1872.338239] ata6: status=0xd0 { Busy } [ 5749.285084] ata8: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [ 5749.285138] ata8: status=0xd0 { Busy } [ 5906.008461] ata6: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [ 5906.008515] ata6: status=0xd0 { Busy } [ 9892.904205] ata6: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [ 9892.904259] ata6: status=0xd0 { Busy } [10146.084687] ata5: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [10146.084740] ata5: status=0xd0 { Busy } [10293.949040] ata5: translated op=0x2a ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00 [10293.949093] ata5: status=0xd0 { Busy }
Can you tell from this what they mean?
This is with 2.6.16-rc3, your patch, and running nine Maxtors disks over onboard nForce4 and MV88SX6081 8-port SATA II PCI-X Controller (rev 09).
for i in `seq 10` do dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile.$i bs=1024k count=10000 done md5sum bigfile.*
The errors mostly seem to happen during the md5sum (not during the dd).
I do not see data corruption or slowdown.
I do need a chunksize of 512k for the raid5. With anything lower (I tried the default 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k and 4096k) I get data corruption and the errors reported in: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=114016903530007&w=2
Thanks!
Sander
-- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |