Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3 | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:09:29 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:18 +0000, Russell King wrote: > Maybe implementing it as a helper function would be the best and > simplest solution? > > static void scsi_release(struct device *dev) > { > schedule_release_process(dev, scsi_release_process); > } > > where schedule_release_process() contains more or less what I posted > in the previous mailing.
That's almost exactly the execute_in_process_context() API that began this discussion (and which Andi NAK'd). However, it could possibly be resurrected with the proviso that the caller has to feed in the workqueue memory. How would people feel about that?
James
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |