[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/5] lightweight robust futexes: -V1
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <> wrote:
> > >This patchset provides a new (written from scratch) implementation of
> > >robust futexes, called "lightweight robust futexes". We believe this new
> > >implementation is faster and simpler than the vma-based robust futex
> > >solutions presented before, and we'd like this patchset to be adopted in
> > >the upstream kernel. This is version 1 of the patchset.
> >
> > Next point of discussion must be PI. [...]
> robustness is an orthogonal feature to Priority Inheritance. In fact it
> was requested before on lkml to separate robustness support from PI
> support, and the vma-based robust futex patches now do precisely that -
> they dont offer PI. So no, PI does not play here, it's a separate thing.

I was more interested in knowing if you considered it in the design.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-16 16:46    [W:0.058 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site