lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: Random reboots
    From

    Ryan,

    On 2006-02-15, Ryan Richter wrote:
    > It's a Tyan S2880, and I'm using their sensors.conf:
    >
    > ftp://ftp.tyan.com/software/lms/lms_s2880.tgz
    >
    > Here's what sensors reports:
    >
    > w83627hf-isa-0290
    > Adapter: ISA adapter
    > VCore 1: +1.54 V (min = +1.47 V, max = +1.62 V) ALARM
    > VCore 2: +1.54 V (min = +1.47 V, max = +1.62 V) ALARM
    > +3.3V: +3.33 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V)
    > +5V: +4.97 V (min = +4.73 V, max = +5.24 V)
    > +12V: +4.56 V (min = +10.82 V, max = +13.19 V)
    > -12V: -2.25 V (min = -13.18 V, max = -10.88 V)
    > -5V: -3.94 V (min = -5.25 V, max = -4.75 V)
    > V5SB: +5.51 V (min = +4.73 V, max = +5.24 V)
    > VBat: +1.28 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +3.60 V)
    > fan1: 4354 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
    > fan2: 3479 RPM (min = 5273 RPM, div = 2)
    > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 30681 RPM, div = 2)
    > temp1: +77°C (high = -128°C, hyst = -128°C) sensor = thermistor
    > temp2: +77.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor
    > temp3: +77.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor
    > vid: +1.550 V (VRM Version 2.4)

    There's one chip missing. If memory serves, this board has two hardware
    monitoring chips: one Winbond Super-I/O and one LM85-compatible SMBus
    chip. You are missing the i2c-amd756 driver in your kernel build
    (CONFIG_I2C_AMD756) which prevents you from accessing that second chip.

    Additionally, the Winbond Super-I/O chips are better supported by the
    newer w83627hf driver than by the w83781d you are using.

    So, you should change your kernel configuration to:

    CONFIG_I2C_AMD756=y
    #CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D is not set
    CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627HF=y

    Then you'll probably have much better results - even if the
    configuration file might need additional tweaking.

    > Still, I don't see why the new kernel shouldn't be stable if 2.6.11.3
    > was.

    If not software regression, the aging of your hardware might have caused
    it, as I mentioned earlier. But you are free to believe in the
    hypothesis you prefer, given that we are not currently able to
    demonstrate it anyway ;)

    --
    Jean Delvare
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-15 17:26    [W:0.027 / U:2.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site