![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 13 February 2006 16:32, MIke Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:05 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Monday 13 February 2006 15:59, MIke Galbraith wrote: > > > Now, let's see if we can get your problem fixed with something that can > > > possibly go into 2.6.16 as a bugfix. Can you please try the below? > > > > These sorts of changes definitely need to pass through -mm first... and > > don't forget -mm looks quite different to mainline. > > I'll leave that up to Ingo of course, and certainly have no problem with > them burning in mm. However, I must say that I personally classify > these two changes as being trivial and obviously correct enough to be > included in 2.6.16. This part I agree with: - } else - requeue_task(next, array); + } The rest changes behaviour; it's not a "bug" so needs testing, should be a separate patch from this part, and modified to suit -mm. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-13 05:42 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||