[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Kyle Moffett wrote:

> Which causes worse data-loss, writing out cached pages and filesystem
> metadata to a filesystem that has changed in the mean-time (possibly
> allocating those for metadata, etc) or forcibly unmounting it as
> though the user pulled the cable? Most filesystems are designed to
> handle the latter (it's the same as a hard-shutdown), whereas _none_
> are designed to handle the former.

That's a good point. Furthermore, any decent suspend script will flush
all dirty buffers to disk before suspending anything.

> A good set of suspend scripts should handle the hardware-suspend with
> no extra work because hardware supporting hardware-suspend basically
> inevitably supports USB low-power-mode,

Unfortunately a lot of hardware doesn't support USB low-power mode. I
guess you'd say therefore it doesn't really support hardware-suspend.
This may be so, but it's small comfort to the owners of those systems.

I have to admit, although technically Phillip's argument is wrong, from a
useability standpoint it is right. Windows allows users to disconnect and
reconnect USB storage devices while the system is hibernating, with no
apparent ill effects -- although I've never tried to unplug one device and
then plug in a different one on the same port while the computer was
asleep. I don't know to what extent Windows checks descriptors/serial
numbers/disk labels/whatever when it wakes up.

Alan Stern

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-14 05:32    [W:0.172 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site