![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 13 February 2006 08:44, Joerg Schilling wrote: > "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote: > > > Are you accepting such a patch? > > > > If his response to the last patch someone provided is any example the > > answer is going to be no. And I firmly believe the old adage that a > > leopard can't change it's spots. > > Any patch that > > - does not break things > > - fits into the spirit of the currnt implementation > > - offers useful new features > > - conforms to coding style standards > > - does not need more time to integrate than I would need to > write this from scratch > > Unfortunately, many people who send patches to me do not follow > these simple rules. Okay - show me your standards document and I'll get to work on a patch to do what I earlier proposed. It won't be "adding new functionality" but it will be making the interface a tiny bit simpler for the novice user. DRH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-13 23:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||