[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> In other words: your patch re-introduces half of the bug on low-res
> platforms. Users doing a series of one-shot itimer calls would be
> exposed to the same kind of (incorrect and unnecessary) summing-up
> errors. What's the point?

I don't fully agree with the interval behaviour either, but here one could
at least say it's correct on average. Since hrtimer is also used for
nanosleep(), which I consider more important (as e.g. posix timer), this
one should at least be correct and consistent with previous 2.6 releases.
I don't mind fixing it properly, but just omitting the rounding here is
simply not correct.

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-13 16:52    [W:0.057 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site