[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time

    On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > In other words: your patch re-introduces half of the bug on low-res
    > platforms. Users doing a series of one-shot itimer calls would be
    > exposed to the same kind of (incorrect and unnecessary) summing-up
    > errors. What's the point?

    I don't fully agree with the interval behaviour either, but here one could
    at least say it's correct on average. Since hrtimer is also used for
    nanosleep(), which I consider more important (as e.g. posix timer), this
    one should at least be correct and consistent with previous 2.6 releases.
    I don't mind fixing it properly, but just omitting the rounding here is
    simply not correct.

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-13 16:52    [W:0.019 / U:32.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site