Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:47:58 +0100 | From | jerome lacoste <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
On 2/13/06, Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > jerome lacoste <jerome.lacoste@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2/13/06, Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Are you accepting such a patch? > > > > > > > > If his response to the last patch someone provided is any example the answer > > > > is going to be no. And I firmly believe the old adage that a leopard can't > > > > change it's spots. > > > > > > Any patch that > > > > > > - does not break things > > > > > > - fits into the spirit of the currnt implementation > > > > > > - offers useful new features > > > > > > - conforms to coding style standards > > > > > > - does not need more time to integrate than I would need to > > > write this from scratch > > > > > > Unfortunately, many people who send patches to me do not follow > > > these simple rules. > > > > I am still waiting for an answer as to whether such a patch would be > > accepted. We will take on the practical details later on. > > If this answer is not sufficient to you, you seem to be wrong here.
We probably misunderstood each other here. I want a technical approval regarding the proposal I made (which is "publicise the os specific to b,t,l mapping found by cdrecord").
Then I write the patch and I will make sure it will pass all your defined criteria.
Jerome - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |