![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 2/13/06, Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote: > > > > Are you accepting such a patch? > > > > If his response to the last patch someone provided is any example the answer > > is going to be no. And I firmly believe the old adage that a leopard can't > > change it's spots. > > Any patch that > > - does not break things > > - fits into the spirit of the currnt implementation > > - offers useful new features > > - conforms to coding style standards > > - does not need more time to integrate than I would need to > write this from scratch > > Unfortunately, many people who send patches to me do not follow > these simple rules. I am still waiting for an answer as to whether such a patch would be accepted. We will take on the practical details later on. Jerome - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-13 15:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||