Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:19:48 -0800 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support. |
| |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:42:12 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes: > > > - If you want my cheerfully uninformed opinion, we should toss both of > > them out and implement suspend3, which is based on the kexec/kdump > > infrastructnure. There's so much duplication of intent here that it's not > > funny. And having them separate like this weakens both in the area where > > the real problems are: drivers. > > Ahh!!! I'm surrounded. > > suspend by kexec > suspend by migration > > Is there a way out? > > Can I avoid it? > > Do all roads lead to suspend? > > :)
All is not lost. Recently I've had good results with suspend-to-disk (sort of a who cares). And suspend-to-RAM seems to work for me.... but no resume. :(
--- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |