lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:42:12 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
>
> > - If you want my cheerfully uninformed opinion, we should toss both of
> > them out and implement suspend3, which is based on the kexec/kdump
> > infrastructnure. There's so much duplication of intent here that it's not
> > funny. And having them separate like this weakens both in the area where
> > the real problems are: drivers.
>
> Ahh!!! I'm surrounded.
>
> suspend by kexec
> suspend by migration
>
> Is there a way out?
>
> Can I avoid it?
>
> Do all roads lead to suspend?
>
> :)

All is not lost.
Recently I've had good results with suspend-to-disk (sort of a who cares).
And suspend-to-RAM seems to work for me.... but no resume. :(

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-11 16:21    [W:0.448 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site