lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 11 Feb 2006 07:19:48 -0800
From"Randy.Dunlap" <>
SubjectRe: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:42:12 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> 
> > - If you want my cheerfully uninformed opinion, we should toss both of
> >   them out and implement suspend3, which is based on the kexec/kdump
> >   infrastructnure.  There's so much duplication of intent here that it's not
> >   funny.  And having them separate like this weakens both in the area where
> >   the real problems are: drivers.
> 
> Ahh!!! I'm surrounded.
> 
> suspend by kexec
> suspend by migration
> 
> Is there a way out?
> 
> Can I avoid it?
> 
> Do all roads lead to suspend?
> 
> :)

All is not lost.
Recently I've had good results with suspend-to-disk (sort of a who cares).
And suspend-to-RAM seems to work for me.... but no resume. :(
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-11 15:21    [W:1.255 / U:0.030 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans