Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:39:34 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does | From | (Arthur Othieno) |
| |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Arthur, > > > insmod will tell us when the module failed to load. We do no further > > processing on the return from i2c_add_driver(), so just return what > > i2c_add_driver() did, instead of storing it. > > > > Add __init/__exit annotations while we're at it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arthur Othieno <apgo@patchbomb.org> > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> > > Arthur, do you have such a device yourself? I have another cleanup > patch for this driver and am looking for testers.
Unfortunately not ;( This was the last of i2c_add_driver() return audit I had sitting around. I'm sure someone with said device will speak up.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |