lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does
From
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> > insmod will tell us when the module failed to load. We do no further
> > processing on the return from i2c_add_driver(), so just return what
> > i2c_add_driver() did, instead of storing it.
> >
> > Add __init/__exit annotations while we're at it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arthur Othieno <apgo@patchbomb.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> Arthur, do you have such a device yourself? I have another cleanup
> patch for this driver and am looking for testers.

Unfortunately not ;( This was the last of i2c_add_driver() return audit
I had sitting around. I'm sure someone with said device will speak up..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-11 15:46    [W:0.039 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site