[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v23
On Friday 10 February 2006 16:32, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Just so it's clear I understand, is this what you (both) had in mind?
> > Inline so it's not built for !CONFIG_SWAP_PREFETCH
> Close...

> > +inline void lru_cache_add_tail(struct page *page)
> Is this inline going to do what you intend?

I don't care if it's actually inlined, but the subtleties of compilers is way
beyond me. All it positively achieves is silencing the unused function
warning so I had hoped it meant that function was not built. I tend to be
wrong though...

> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> > + add_page_to_inactive_list_tail(zone, page);
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-10 06:40    [W:0.034 / U:18.468 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site