![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > If enough interesting content is licensed that way, DRM eventually becomes > marginalized. Yes, it takes decades, but that's really no different at all > from how the GPL works. The GPL has taken decades, and it hasn't > "marginalized" commercial proprietary software yet, but it's gotten to the > point where fewer people at least _worry_ about it. ... > The GPL already requires source code (ie non-protected content). So the > GPL already _does_ have an anti-DRM clause as far as the _software_ is > concerned. If you want to fight DRM on non-software fronts, you need to > create non-software content, and fight it _there_. > > I realize that programmers are bad at content creation. So many > programmers feel that they can't fight DRM that way. Tough. Spread the > word instead. Don't try to fight DRM the wrong way. Bullseye. It dawned on me after sending earlier emails that I should've mentioned the responsibility of content creators, but I'm glad I didn't, you've summed it up quite eloquently. Karim -- President / Opersys Inc. Embedded Linux Training and Expertise www.opersys.com / 1.866.677.4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-02-02 00:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||