Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:11:08 +0100 | From | Thomas Renninger <> | Subject | Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > The patch titled > > > > cpufreq: _PPC frequency change issues - freq already lowered by BIOS > > > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > > > cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch > > > > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find > > out what to do about this > > > > *puzzled look* > > I merged this into cpufreq-git last week. > > diff-tree 0961dd0... (from c70ca00...) > Author: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> > Date: Thu Jan 26 18:46:33 2006 +0100 > > [CPUFREQ] _PPC frequency change issues > > > > Did your pull fail for some reason? > > Dave
I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch from cpufreq list?: ____________ This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree. I'd suggest that you prepare patches against latest -mm, which includes git-cpufreq.patch.
Please also include the required Signed-off-by: tags, as per section 11 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches. ____________
The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I resend the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to avuton@gmail.com (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?
Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |