lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > The patch titled
> >
> > cpufreq: _PPC frequency change issues - freq already lowered by BIOS
> >
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> >
> > cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch
> >
> > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> > out what to do about this
> >
>
> *puzzled look*
>
> I merged this into cpufreq-git last week.
>
> diff-tree 0961dd0... (from c70ca00...)
> Author: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> Date: Thu Jan 26 18:46:33 2006 +0100
>
> [CPUFREQ] _PPC frequency change issues
>
>
>
> Did your pull fail for some reason?
>
> Dave

I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch
from cpufreq list?:
____________
This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree. I'd suggest
that you prepare patches against latest -mm, which includes
git-cpufreq.patch.

Please also include the required Signed-off-by: tags, as per section 11 of
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
____________

The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I resend
the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to
avuton@gmail.com (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?

Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-01 13:13    [W:0.071 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site