![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i've submitted a number of patches recently and, every time i do a > "git pull", i check the log to see if any of them have been applied so > i can delete them from my personal "submitted but not applied" > directory. if they've been applied by another author, then naturally > i'll never notice and i'll keep wondering about the delay. > > so what's the protocol here? are more senior kernel developers > allowed to poach on my patch submissions, tidy them up slightly, then > drop any attribution to me? enquiring minds *definitely* want this > cleared up. > > rday > > p.s. it's possible that this is all just a wild coincidence, of > course. stranger things have happened. The protocol is simply to do best to give credit where credit is due. If your patch is taken directly, most likely it is a mistake if attribution was dropped. If your patch was modified, often that patch will get checked in under the name of the person who last touched the change before commit -- and it is their responsibility to make sure and note that the change originally came from you. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-09 11:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||