lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: workqueue deadlock
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:47:01AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> - Make it rw-sem

I think rw-sems also were shown to hit deadlocks (recursive read-lock
attempt deadlocks when a writer comes between the two read attempts by the same
thread). So below suggestion only seems to makes sense ..

> - Make it per-cpu mutex, which could be either:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/30/110 - Ingo's suggestion
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/26/65 - Gautham's work based on RCU
>
> In Ingo's suggestion, I really dont know if the task_struct
> modifications is a good thing (to support recursive requirements).
> Gautham's patches avoid modifications to task_struct, is fast but can
> starve writers (who want to bring down/up a CPU).

--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-07 07:49    [W:0.396 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site