![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote: > > > Should tsc be preferred to pit though? > > Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are > detected, we mark the tsc as unstable. Turns out I was seeing C2 states. I'll stick with PIT for now. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Campbell If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-06 19:49 [W:0.165 / U:0.090 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||