![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:43:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > The logic I have there is the same (I hope)... > > + if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime, > + &inode->i_atime) < 0 && > + timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime, > + &inode->i_atime) < 0) > + return; Oh ok, yeah I didn't notice that the arguments to timespec_compare() had been changed! --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-06 06:59 [W:1.909 / U:0.020 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||