![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:28:09 -0800
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> > if (vfsmnt->mnt_flags & MNT_RELATIME) {
> > - if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) < 0) ||
> > - (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) < 0))
> > + if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) <= 0) ||
> > + (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) <= 0))
> > return 1;
> Hmm, should we fix up touch_atime() to use "<=" as well? Maybe I didn't read
> it correctly...
The logic I have there is the same (I hope)...
+ if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
+ &inode->i_atime) < 0 &&
+ timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
+ &inode->i_atime) < 0)
+ return;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-06 06:47 [W:0.133 / U:0.290 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||