lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromNeil Brown <>
DateTue, 5 Dec 2006 15:07:11 +1100
SubjectRe: 2.6.19-rc6-mm2
On Tuesday December 5, neilb@suse.de wrote:
> 
> I notice it says:
>                      |
>                      v
> >  090: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
> >  Single bit error detected. Probably bad RAM.
> >  Run memtest86+ or a similar memory test tool.
> 
> Have you tried running memtest86 ??

As Andrew correctly pointed out, this bit error is not a RAM problem.
It is actually the low bit of a counter a spinlock that was
decremented just before the WARN_ON.  So it simply indicates that the
inode had already been freed, which I think we knew already.

Unfortunately I still have no idea why that inode had been
freed but was still referenced by a dentry....
How repeatable as this bug?  How did you narrow it down to that patch?
Did you use git-bisect or something else?


Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-05 04:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008