Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Dec 2006 22:58:40 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3) |
| |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle > type (however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem.
i havent changed the cycles_t type - it's still 32-bit. I agree with you that we dont want to bloat 32-bit arch-level code by artificially forcing everyone to a 64-bit cycles_t.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |