lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3)

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle
> type (however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem.

i havent changed the cycles_t type - it's still 32-bit. I agree with you
that we dont want to bloat 32-bit arch-level code by artificially
forcing everyone to a 64-bit cycles_t.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-04 23:03    [W:1.286 / U:1.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site