Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:15:21 -0800 (PST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: la la la la ... swappiness |
| |
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> but that's rather dumb. Better would be to remove mlocked pages from the > LRU.
Could we generalize the removal of sections of a zone from the LRU? I believe this would help various buffer allocation schemes. We have some issues with heavy LRU scans if large buffers are allocated on some nodes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |