![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Aucoin wrote: >>From: Nick Piggin [mailto:nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au] >>We had customers see similar incorrect OOM problems, so I sent in some >>patches merged after 2.6.16. Can you upgrade to latest kernel? (otherwise >>I guess backporting could be an option for you). > > > I will raise the question of moving the kernel forward one more time before > release. Can you point me to the patches you mentioned? These two are the main ones: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=408d85441cd5a9bd6bc851d677a10c605ed8db5f http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4ff1ffb4870b007b86f21e5f27eeb11498c4c077 They shouldn't be too hard to backport. I'd be interested to know how OOM and page reclaim behaves after these patches (or with a newer kernel). Thanks, Nick -- Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-04 15:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||