[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
On Sun 2006-12-03 16:21:25, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
> > I agree with Al, Matthew and Pavel. The current timer stuff is a pita
> > and needs fixing, and it seems Al has come up with a good way to do it
> > without adding additional crap into every single user of timers.
> What exactly is the pita here? Al only came up with some rather
> theoretical problems with no practical relevance.

Lack of type-checking in timers is ugly.

> > Al - I look forward to your changes.
> I don't. The current API is maybe not perfect, but changing the API for no
> practical benefit would be an even bigger pita. I'd rather keep it as is.

Al is trying to add type-checking in pretty nice & straightforward
manner. Please let him do it.
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-03 22:03    [W:0.056 / U:12.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site