Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:37:39 +0100 (CET) | From | Tim Schmielau <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h |
| |
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:48:30 +0000 Russell King wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:32:46PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:34:38 +0000 Russell King wrote: > > > > The whole "all*config" idea on ARM is utterly useless - you can _not_ > > > > get build coverage that way. > > > > > > Uh, can J. Random Developer submit patches to the ARM build system > > > for testing? > > > > Given that it takes about 8 to 12 hours to do a build cycle, that's > > not practical. The only real solution is for us to accept that > > breakage will occur (and be prepared to keep a steady stream of > > fixes heading into Linus' tree - which has been ruled out by Linus) > > or J. Random Developer has to build a set of affected ARM defconfigs > > themselves. > > I guess I don't get it. Isn't that what we just went thru > with the struct nightmare^W work_struct changes? > But these header file changes are much simpler and more obvious...
Well, I think it's practical to build all arm configs yourself. I'll do that for my sched.h #include changes. It's been less that two hours since I started the builds on two cpus and I already got 35 out of 59 configs.
It's just that one has to be aware of it. Before Russell's post the situation on arm seemed so confusing to me that I thought I'd just compile allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig and allyesconfig and let the arm people figure out the rest.
Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |