lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:48:30 +0000 Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:32:46PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:34:38 +0000 Russell King wrote:
> > > The whole "all*config" idea on ARM is utterly useless - you can _not_
> > > get build coverage that way.
> >
> > Uh, can J. Random Developer submit patches to the ARM build system
> > for testing?
>
> Given that it takes about 8 to 12 hours to do a build cycle, that's
> not practical. The only real solution is for us to accept that
> breakage will occur (and be prepared to keep a steady stream of
> fixes heading into Linus' tree - which has been ruled out by Linus)
> or J. Random Developer has to build a set of affected ARM defconfigs
> themselves.

I guess I don't get it. Isn't that what we just went thru
with the struct nightmare^W work_struct changes?
But these header file changes are much simpler and more obvious...


> Or alternatively the guy who's running kautobuild needs an amount of
> rather powerful donated hardware to stubstantially increase it's
> throughput.
>
> Or cross-gcc needs to be optimised to compile faster.
>
> I don't see any of the above happening, so...

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-29 01:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site