![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 12/22/06, Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli <chbhanukalyan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the suggestion but the performance was terrible when write > > cache was disabled. > > Performance degradation is expected. But the point is - did the > anomaly, that you have pointed out, go away? Because if it did, then > it is the disk cache which is causing the issue, and you will have to > live with it. Else you will have to look elsewhere. oops, sorry for incomplete answer. Actually i did not tested thoroughly but my initial tests showed some bumps and serious performance degradation. But anyway there was still some bumps... :( (sequence)(channel)(write time in microseconds) 0 0 6366 0 1 9949 0 2 10125 0 3 10165 0 4 11043 0 5 10129 0 6 10089 0 7 10165 0 8 71572 0 9 9882 0 10 8105 0 11 10085 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- regards Manish Regmi --------------------------------------------------------------- UNIX without a C Compiler is like eating Spaghetti with your mouth sewn shut. It just doesn't make sense. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-22 06:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||