lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 19 Dec 2006 21:15:51 -0800 (PST)
SubjectRe: Bug 7596 - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
FromDavid Miller <>
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:11:24 -0800

> It was the realtime/normal comments that piqued my interest.
> Perhaps we should either tweak process priority or remove
> the comments.

I mentioned that to Linus once and he said the entire
idea was bogus.

With the recent tcp_recvmsg() preemption issue thread,
I agree with his sentiments even more than I did previously.

What needs to happen is to liberate the locking so that
input packet processing can occur in parallel with
tcp_recvmsg(), instead of doing this bogus backlog thing
which can wedge TCP ACK processing for an entire quantum
if we take a kernel preemption while the process has the
socket lock held.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-20 05:19    [W:0.371 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans