Messages in this thread |  | | | From | "David Schwartz" <> | | Subject | RE: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away | | Date | Sat, 2 Dec 2006 20:29:28 -0800 |
| |
> > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.
> This is the first correct statement in your email. In any case the > documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you > have been trying to persuade us they should be. I would argue that > the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I > really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm > going to leave it at that.
I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC guarantees" documented?
DS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |