[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away

> > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.

> This is the first correct statement in your email. In any case the
> documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you
> have been trying to persuade us they should be. I would argue that
> the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I
> really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm
> going to leave it at that.

I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually
provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC
guarantees" documented?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-03 05:33    [W:0.355 / U:2.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site