lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away
    Date

    > > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.

    > This is the first correct statement in your email. In any case the
    > documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you
    > have been trying to persuade us they should be. I would argue that
    > the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I
    > really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm
    > going to leave it at that.

    I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually
    provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC
    guarantees" documented?

    DS


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-03 05:33    [W:0.023 / U:30.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site