Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [new patch 3/3] fs: fix cont vs deadlock patches | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Date | Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:43:05 +0900 |
| |
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> writes:
>> I see. I guess you need to synchronise your writepage versus this >> extention in order to handle it properly then. I won't bother with >> that though: it won't be worse than it was before. >> >> Thanks for review, do you agree with the other hunks? > > Well, Andrew's got the rest of the patches in his tree, so I'll send > what we've got for now. Has had some testing on both reiserfs and > fat. Doesn't look like the other filesystems using cont_prepare_write > will have any problems... > > Andrew, please apply this patch as a replacement for the fat-fix > patch in your rollup (this patch includes the same fix, and is a > more logical change unit I think).
I'm confused. I couldn't track what is final patchset. Anyway, I'll see and test your final patchset in -mm.
Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |