lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
Date
On Saturday, 16 December 2006 12:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 December 2006 10:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 16 December 2006 00:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> > > > >> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
> > > > >>> and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them.
> > > > >> hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain. Rafael, are
> > > > >> you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pci-move-pci_vdevice-from-libata-to-core.patch
> > > > >> pata_cs5530-suspend-resume-support-tweak.patch
> > > > >> ata-fix-platform_device_register_simple-error-check.patch
> > > > >> initializer-entry-defined-twice-in-pata_rz1000.patch
> > > > >> pata_via-suspend-resume-support-fix.patch
> > > > >> sata_nv-add-suspend-resume-support.patch
> > > > >> libata-simulate-report-luns-for-atapi-devices.patch
> > > > >> user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-patch-ata-subsystem.patch
> > > > >> libata-fix-oops-with-sparsemem.patch
> > > > >> sata_nv-fix-kfree-ordering-in-remove.patch
> > > > >> libata-dont-initialize-sg-in-ata_exec_internal-if-dma_none-take-2.patch
> > > > >> pci-quirks-fix-the-festering-mess-that-claims-to-handle-ide-quirks-ide-fix.patch
> > > > >>
> > > > >> are innocent?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, they are.
> > > >
> > > > We all really appreciate your patience :) This is good feedback.
> > > >
> > > > To narrow down some more, does applying 2.6.20-rc1 + the attached patch
> > > > work? (ignoring -mm tree altogether)
> > >
> > > Yes, it does.
> >
> > I've applied the patches from -rc1-mm1 up to and including
> >
> > problem-phy-probe-not-working-properly-for-ibm_emac-ppc4xx.patch
> >
> > on top of 2.6.20-rc1 and they don't seem to break anything. Will try some
> > more.
>
> The patch that breaks things is somewhere between
>
> dont-export-device-ids-to-userspace.patch
>
> and
>
> funsoft-is-bust-on-sparc.patch
>
> inclusive.
>
> Now I'll need to resync my disk arrays so if anyone has any suggestions
> what to try next, I'll be grateful. ;-)

Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear, which is

fix-sense-key-medium-error-processing-and-retry.patch

With this patch reverted -rc1-mm1 is happily running on my test box.

Greetings,
Rafael


--
If you don't have the time to read,
you don't have the time or the tools to write.
- Stephen King
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-17 12:01    [W:0.081 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site