[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:08:41AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:03:57AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > >
    > > > I actually think the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() thing is a good thing, if
    > > > done properly (and I think we use it fairly well).
    > > >
    > > > I think we _can_ do things where we give clear hints to people that
    > > > "we think this is such an internal Linux thing that you simply
    > > > cannot use this without being considered a derived work".
    > >
    > > Then why not change the name to something more along those lines?
    > Yes, EXPORT_SYMBOL_INTERNAL would make a lot more sense.

    I find all those names confusing. If these special symbols are
    GPL/INTERNAL/WHATEVER, what are the other exported symbols?

    GPL -> Non-GPL?
    INTERNAL -> External?



    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-17 11:59    [W:0.019 / U:1.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site