lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
Alan wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
>>> and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
>>>
>>> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them.
>> hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain. Rafael, are
>> you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these:
>
> The md one and the long history of reports about parallel I/O causing
> problems sounds a lot more like the kmap stuff you were worried about
> Andrew. I'd be very intereste dto know if it happens on x86_32 built with
> a standard memory split and no highmem....

2.6.20-rc1 works, and 2.6.20-rc1 does not have the kmap_atomic() fix.

Upstream does kmap_atomic(KM_USER0) and -mm does kmap_atomic(KM_IRQ0)

Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-15 23:23    [W:0.139 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site