lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates
On 12/15/06, Jörn Engel <joern@lazybastard.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > Not in simple cases.
> > >
> > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like
> > > (3 * i) + (2 * j)
> >
> > I would just write it as:
> > 3 * i + 2 * j
>
> So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2)
> because I prefer the grouping in
> for (i=0; i<10; i+=2)
>

Would you write:

i+=2;

outside the loop? If not then it is better to keep style consistent
and not use condensed form in loops either.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-15 21:59    [W:0.079 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site