Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:46 -0500 | From | "Dmitry Torokhov" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates |
| |
On 12/15/06, Jörn Engel <joern@lazybastard.org> wrote: > On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Not in simple cases. > > > > > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like > > > (3 * i) + (2 * j) > > > > I would just write it as: > > 3 * i + 2 * j > > So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write > for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) > because I prefer the grouping in > for (i=0; i<10; i+=2) >
Would you write:
i+=2;
outside the loop? If not then it is better to keep style consistent and not use condensed form in loops either.
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |