lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
    Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:38:27PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    >
    >> Yes, EXPORT_SYMBOL_INTERNAL would make a lot more sense.
    >
    > A quick grep shows that changing this now would require updating
    > nearly 1900 instances, so patches to do this would be pretty large and
    > disruptive (though we could support both during a transition and
    > migrate them over time).

    Please don't use that name, it strikes me as much more confusing than
    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, even though I agree that _GPL doesn't quite convey
    what it means, either.

    EXPORT_SYMBOL_RESTRICTED? EXPORT_SYMBOL_DERIVED? At least something
    which is not internally inconsistent would be good (how is something
    which is exported "internal?")

    And, as long as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL continues to check that the module
    using it has a GPL license, then it really -is- exactly descriptive of
    what it's doing and probably shouldn't be changed. IIMHO.

    -Eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-14 19:19    [W:0.061 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site