![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 12/13/06, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> writes: > > the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already > > enough... at least for irqbalance > > What is the problem you are trying to solve? > > If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that > with a single bit. > > My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to > solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see > the real world problem. Good question. irqbalance could use set_affinity from boot cpu to final cpu. YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-14 07:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||