[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19
    Duncan Sands wrote:
    >> I'm really not convinced about the user-mode thing unless somebody can
    >> show me a good reason for it. Not just some "wouldn't it be nice" kind of
    >> thing. A real, honest-to-goodness reason that we actually _want_ to see
    >> used.
    > Qemu? It would be nice if emulators could directly drive hardware:
    > useful for reverse engineering windows drivers for example.
    > Duncan.

    I have reverse engineered many windows drivers, and what you suggest is
    not at all helpful. For reverse engineering, one wants to see what is
    happening. I.e. capture all the IO, MMIO and DMA accesses.
    Your suggestion bypasses this possibility.
    For reverse engineering windows drivers, one puts breakpoints in the
    HAL.DLL code or replaces the HAL.DLL code with a debugging version of it
    while actually running windows.

    Your approach runs into problems.
    There is a register on the card that sets the DMA base address, but you
    don't know which register this is. If you let the driver inside QEMU
    write to this register, it will write values suitable for the Virtual
    machine instead of values suitable to for host OS. The DMA transaction
    will write all over the wrong memory location resulting in CRASH.

    One might be able to get round some of these problem with a combination
    of QEMU and a hacked up HAL.DLL, but it will be complicated.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-14 13:31    [W:0.029 / U:0.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site