Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Subject | Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs | Date | Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:14:55 -0700 |
| |
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> There is still a question of how to handle the NUMA case but... >> > > the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already > enough... at least for irqbalance
What is the problem you are trying to solve?
If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that with a single bit.
My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see the real world problem.
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |