Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:56 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing |
| |
* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> > the other problem is load_balance(): there this_rq is locked and you > > call resched_cpu() unconditionally. > > But here resched_cpu() was called after double_rq_unlock().
yeah, you are right - the schedule() one is/was the only problem.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |