[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [NETLINK]: Schedule removal of old macros exported to userspace
    On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 15:58 +0100, Stefan Rompf wrote:
    > But when even glibc needs internal compat headers to compile with the second
    > kernel version that provides userspace headers, what is the long-term - even
    > mid-term - perspective of make headers_install then?

    Bear in mind that with the first cut of the headers_install I was trying
    to keep it entirely uncontentious and stick to _mechanism_, not policy.
    The _first_ set of exported headers still aren't ideal, and we're still
    cleaning up some parts of them (like properly getting rid of the
    _syscallX() macros, etc.).

    We've only just started to be sensible about what we export to userspace
    -- it's not entirely set in stone at this point,


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-12-12 12:29    [W:0.018 / U:86.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site