![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:50:50 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote: > While working on SH kprobes, I noticed that avr32 got the preemption > handling wrong in the no probe case. The idea is that upon entry of > kprobe_handler() preemption is disabled outright across the life of > the kprobe, only to be re-enabled in post_kprobe_handler(). > > However, in the event that the probe is never activated, there's never > any chance of hitting the post probe handler, which allows for the > current avr32 implementation to disable preemption indefinitely, as > it's currently missing a re-enable when no probe is activated. You're absolutely right. Thanks for the patch, I've added it to my tree. Håvard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-01 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||