![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Andrew, On 12/1/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:58:47 -0400 > Mauricio Lin <mauricio.lin@indt.org.br> wrote: > > > Since kobject_uevent() function does not return an integer value to > > indicate if its operation was completed with success or not, it is > > worth changing it in order to report a proper status (success or > > error) instead of returning void. > > > > Keep kobject_uevent() returning the status as integer provide a easier > > way for detecting possible failure in the function. Using void > > returning style may take people to waste more time to figure out if > > the "send to" or "receive from" an event is a bug in the kernel or > > user space. Furthermore, the current way to detect where the error is > > taking place in the kobject_uevent() requires additional inclusion of > > printk() in each "if" condition that can lead to failure. > > Admirable idea, but we have large changes pending against that code > and none of this patch applies. I have used the kobject_uevent() to send event to user space, but when the event does not happen I have to figure out if this problem is related to kernel or user space code. After mentioning this issue with Greg KH, he recommended to provide a patch to fix it. > > A patch against Greg's driver tree, or against latest -mm would suit, thanks. OK. That's good. Thanks. BR, Mauricio Lin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-12-01 15:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||