lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
Hi!

> > > OTOH I have no idea _how_ we can tell xfs that the processes have been
> > > frozen. Should we introduce a global flag for that or something?
> >
> > I guess XFS should just do all the writes from process context, and
> > refuse any writing when its threads are frozen... I actually still
> > believe it is doing the right thing, because you can't really write to
> > disk from timer.
>
> This is from a work queue, so in fact from a process context, but from
> a process that is running with PF_NOFREEZE.

Why not simply &~ PF_NOFREEZE on that particular process? Filesystems
are free to use threads/work queues/whatever, but refrigerator should
mean "no writes to filesystem" for them...

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-09 22:21    [W:0.084 / U:3.640 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site