![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Nate Diller wrote: > Indesiciveness has certainly been an issue here, but I remember akpm > and Ulrich both giving concrete suggestions. I was particularly > interested in Andrew's request to explain and justify the differences > between kevent and BSD's kqueue interface. Was there a discussion > that I missed? I am very interested to see your work on this > mechanism merged, because you've clearly emphasized performance and > shown impressive results. But it seems like we lose out on a lot by > throwing out all the applications that already use kqueue. kqueue looks pretty nice, the filter/note models in particular. I don't see anything about ring buffers though. I also wonder about the asynchronous event side (send), not just the event reception side. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-07 13:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||