![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:36:33 +0100 > Fabio Coatti <cova@ferrara.linux.it> wrote: > >> Hi all; It seems that problems like this has been already reported, but not >> exactly the same, so maybe thsi can add some infos. Otherwise, sorry for the >> noise. >> >> Starting from 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 and up to rc4-mm2, at boot the kernel is unable >> to detect two sata disks, connected to a ICH5 controller. Latest mm working >> kernel seems to be 2.6.18-mm3; 2.6.19-rc4 works just fine. >> >> On rc-4 (vanilla) the log is this: >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk libata version 2.00 loaded. >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.00ac6 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P1 IDE IDE ] >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 18 (level, >> low) -> IRQ 17 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata: 0x170 IDE port busy >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata: conflict with ide1 > > hm. What does that mean? It means that IDE layer claimed the port. It can be overridden by combined_mode kernel parameter. >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xF000 >> irq 14 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata2: DUMMY >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk scsi1 : ata_piix >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 >> NCQ (depth 0/32) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.01: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 586114704 sectors: LBA48 >> NCQ (depth 0/32) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.01: ata1: dev 1 multi count 16 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133 >> >> >> With -mm kernels, I see only the third disk, but attached to a different >> controller (output from rc4 vanilla): >> >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:03.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level, >> low) -> IRQ 18 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata3: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xF8804080 ctl 0xF880408A >> bmdma 0xF8804000 irq 18 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata4: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xF88040C0 ctl 0xF88040CA >> bmdma 0xF8804008 irq 18 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk scsi3 : sata_sil >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata3: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata3.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 >> NCQ (depth 0/32) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata3.00: ata3: dev 0 multi count 0 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata3.00: configured for UDMA/100 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk scsi4 : sata_sil >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 6V320F0 >> VA11 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk SCSI device sdc: 625142448 512-byte hdwr sectors (320073 >> MB) >> Nov 5 13:26:37 kefk sdc: Write Protect is off >> > > And why doesn't -mm report the same conflict? I assume the .config is the > same? Also, please post full dmesg of both kernels. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-06 12:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||